Reactive Hemophagocytic Syndrome in Adult Korean Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case-Control Study and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the characteristics of hemophagocytic syndrome (HPS) in adult Korean patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of 1033 adult patients with SLE for a recent 14-year period and identified 15 patients who had developed HPS. Forty-two age- and sex-matched patients with SLE admitted for other manifestations were included as disease controls. Features of HPS in these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Reactive HPS occurred from some distinct causes during the course of SLE. HPS was associated with SLE in 11 patients (4 at onset of SLE and 7 at SLE flare), infection in 3 patients (2 bacterial infection; 1 viral infection), and drug use (azathioprine) in 1 patient. Common clinical features included fever (93.3%), hepatomegaly (60.0%), and splenomegaly (60.0%). Steroid pulse therapy (46.7%), immunosuppressants (46.7%), and intravenous immunoglobulin (46.7%) were frequently used for treatment of HPS. One patient (6.7%) died. Compared with SLE patients without HPS, those with HPS showed a higher SLEDAI score (p = 0.003) and lower levels of plasma leukocytes (p < 0.001), hemoglobin (p = 0.013), and platelets (p < 0.001) as well as a higher serum C-reactive protein level (p = 0.039) and a lower serum albumin level (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: HPS was observed in 1.5% of adult Korean patients with SLE. The occurrence of HPS was most frequently associated with the SLE disease activity. Profound pancytopenia, a high SLEDAI score, and notable changes in the level of acute-phase reactants can be the characteristics of SLE patients with HPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".