The Differential Hypothesis: A Provocative Rationalization of the Conducted Vasomotor Response
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tissue blood flow is controlled by a branching network of resistance arteries coupled in series and parallel with one another. To alter organ perfusion during periods of elevated metabolic demand, the arterial segments comprising these networks must dilate in a coordinated manner. Gap junctions are intercellular pores that facilitate arterial coordination by enabling electrical stimuli to conduct among and between endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells. Through this novel perspective, readers will be introduced to the vascular communication field, the process of intercellular conduction, and how key cellular properties influence charge flow. This overview will begin with a brief historical review and then introduce two differing theories on how electrical phenomena moves among and between vascular cells. The basis of the "syncytium" and "differential" hypothesis will be critically discussed within a framework of biophysical and experimental observations. This foundational understanding will be used to extend our mechanistic insight of: (i) "local" and "global" blood flow control; and (ii) debilitating disorders such as arterial vasospasm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it