Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au contact d’œuvres d’art, nous sommes enclins le plus souvent à interroger les significations possibles contenues dans les sujets représentés. La question se pose de savoir comment ces sujets, fussent-ils non figuratifs et adoptant de multiples formes de présentation, résorbent la nécessité d’être exprimés. La sémiotique de Peirce fournit des éléments de compréhension lorsqu’on aborde le processus de création. Il est lié aux surgissements de signes, empreintes corporelles originaires de notre organisation psychique, qui sont eux-mêmes travaillés par le musement, flot ininterrompu de nos pensées. L’inscription produite dans le moment de création est une rupture du musement « esthétique », rupture dont le caractère temporel dénote une importance identique à celle vécue dans la cure. En ce sens, l’inscription est première et fait retour sur un principe associatif inconscient, disponible hic et nunc . Ce principe lui est second puisque émergé par coupure dont la continuité s’exerce en révélant singularités et idiolectes plastiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".