Auditory-Based Spectral Amplitude Estimators for Speech Enhancement
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a new family of Bayesian estimators for speech enhancement where the cost function includes both a power law and a weighting factor. The parameters of the cost function, and therefore of the corresponding estimator gain, are chosen based on characteristics of the human auditory system, namely, the compressive nonlinearities of the cochlea, the perceived loudness and the ear's masking properties. It is found that choosing the parameters in this way results in a decrease of the estimator gain at high frequencies. This frequency dependence of the gain improves the noise reduction while limiting the speech distortion. Experimental results show that the new estimators achieve better enhancement performance than existing Bayesian estimators such as those based on the minimum mean-square error (MMSE) of the short-time spectral amplitude (STSA), the MMSE of the logarithm of the STSA (LSA) or the weighted euclidien (WE) error, both in terms of objective and subjective measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it