MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149477305 · doi:10.1002/ceat.200800565

Mapping of the Operating Conditions for an Interconnected Fluidized Bed Reactor for CO<sub>2</sub> Separation by Chemical Looping Combustion

2009· article· en· W2149477305 on OpenAlex
Mingyu Xu, Naoko Ellis, C. Jim Lim, Ho Jin Ryu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering & Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersMinistry of Economy
KeywordsChemical looping combustionCombustionFluidized bedNuclear engineeringChemical reactorProcess engineeringFluidized bed combustionFluidizationAir separationWaste managementChemistryOxygenEnvironmental scienceChemical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract As a promising way of integrating combustion, CO 2 separation, and pollution control with high efficiency and low cost, Chemical Looping Combustion (CLC) has gained attention in recent years. A cold model circulating fluidized bed reactor for chemical looping combustion was designed and operated, in which an additional loop was used to transfer back some oxygen carriers to the air reactor directly for continuous oxidation. Operating conditions of the cold model were investigated as the superficial gas velocities in the reactors and seal‐loops were varied. Their effects on the pressure balance and solids circulation rates in two loops were tested. The experimental results provided a detailed mapping of the range of operating conditions and assisted in the understanding of critical variables controlling the operation of the CLC reactor system. The appropriate operating conditions were optimized for developing the reactor model for CLC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it