MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149517984 · doi:10.1149/1.3422495

Synthesis and Characterization of Well Aligned Ru Nanowires and Nanotubes

2010· article· en· W2149517984 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAnodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNational Research Council CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOverpotentialNanowireMaterials scienceDeposition (geology)Cathodic protectionNanotechnologyChemical engineeringNanotubeCharacterization (materials science)AnodeCarbon nanotubeElectrochemistryChemistryElectrodePhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arrays of well aligned Ru nanowires and nanotubes were prepared by electrodeposition through porous anodic aluminum oxide membranes. It is shown that Ru nanowires are formed at low cathodic deposition overpotential, while nanotubes are prepared at higher cathodic overpotential. The inner diameter of the nanotube can be controlled by the deposition potential, and it varies from 0 to 70% of the outer diameter as the deposition potential is changed from -0.30 to -0.45 V vs SCE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it