MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149534170 · doi:10.1002/masy.200450239

Process modelling and optimization of styrene polymerization

2004· article· en· W2149534170 on OpenAlexaff
Jinlong Gao, Klaus‐Dieter Hungenberg, Alexander Penlidis

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecular Symposia · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicThermal and Kinetic Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolystyreneBifunctionalStyrenePolymerizationMaterials scienceProcess (computing)Process engineeringPolymer chemistryComputer scienceCopolymerPolymerChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Polystyrene is a common commodity with thin margin, it is desirable for industry to reduce the production cost by optimizing the process and producing polystyrene with desired properties. This paper has reviewed several commonly used process optimization policies from the literature. The kinetics of styrene polymerization with mono‐ or bifunctional initiator has also be described. It has been demonstrated that by using a temperature profile combined with selective mono‐ or bifunctional initiators, one can decrease bach time while still maintaining the desired molecular weight averages. The recently developed new tetra‐functional initiator by Elf‐Atochem provides a new tool for controlling/optimization purposes. Industrial process configurations of polystyrene production has also be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromolecular SymposiaSame topicThermal and Kinetic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207