MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149542869 · doi:10.1093/cid/cis710

Cutaneous Manifestations of Infection in the Immunocompromised Host

2012· article· en· W2149542869 on OpenAlexaffabout
Donald C. Vinh

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infectious Diseases · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMontreal General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHost (biology)ImmunologyGraft-versus-host diseaseDermatologyTransplantationSurgeryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This textbook, an update to the first edition published in 1995, attempts to provide physicians a concentrated and comprehensive appreciation of the skin as a critical organ to be inspected during the evaluation of the immunocompromised host. Indeed, the spectrum of such patients in modern medicine is expanding, not only from the increasing numbers of patients, but also from the diverse armamentarium of immunosuppressants. The management of infections in the patient with abnormal host defense can be daunting, in part because of the array of potential pathogens; the variability in clinical presentation and course; and the necessity for rapid implementation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy to optimize chances for survival. This book contributes to the care of such patients by focusing exclusively on, and thus raising awareness of, the skin manifestations of infectious diseases in these patients. Although infectious disease physicians may be attracted to the book's topic, it should be noted that its organization is distinctly different from that habitually found in other books geared to the clinician dealing with infections. Rather than using a microbial approach organized into familiar taxons (eg bacteria, mycobacteria, fungi, parasites) and/or a syndromic approach (eg macules/papules, nodules, etc.), followed by a top-down strategy, the book is organized into an intertwined mixture of such chapters, which I found a little awkward at times. For example, the first chapter, on “Subcutaneous and Deep Mycoses” is divided into sections on specific organisms (eg Aspergillosis; Candidiasis; Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria). This is then followed by the chapter on “Hyalohyphomycosis”, potentially providing the impression to those less familiar with medical mycology that this is a separate entity caused by fungal pathogens distinct from the preceding chapter. This chapter is then followed by one on “Superficial Mycoses”, but in which mucosal candidiasis is noticeably absent. The chapters on bacteria (which, in my experience, are one of the more common causes of skin infections in immunocompromised hosts) are preceded by several chapters on arguably less common pathogens (eg Algae; Rickettsiae; Protozoa). Thus, the infectious disease clinician may need to adapt to this book's distinct didactic style. This book is intended to be a clinical dermatological manual. In this regard, the various sections are extremely and amply well illustrated. The photographs are in color, well illuminated, and focused beautifully for the characteristic lesion discussed to be easily identified. In those cases attempting to demonstrate progression of the lesion, fantastic sequential photographs are provided. The captions accompanying each image are clear and concise. The images are strategically well-placed, in the relevant section on the discussed pathogen, preventing the reader from flipping through pages to find the figures, as sometimes occurs for other dermatological books. For the occasional histological figure, however, instructional arrows supporting the caption may be considered in future editions. For the non-infectious disease physician, the text on each pathogen is simple, concise and sufficiently informative, summarizing material from the standard textbooks of infectious diseases. However, it is certainly not meant to be comprehensive: the sections do not delve into microbiology, pathogenesis from the immunocompromised host's perspective, and only occasionally are treatment options mentioned. The authors performed a monumental task of reviewing published literature on the various skin manifestations reported with each pathogen. What I would have preferred is to structure the text in a way that first focuses on the “classic” skin lesion by the respective pathogen, and then to proceed to a table format listing the plethora of other “atypical” skin manifestations identified from the case reports. Organizing it as such would have been less distracting, at least for this reader. For those seeking further information, the sources in the reference lists are well chosen. What I particularly enjoy when reading infectious disease textbooks (or even better, discussing these books with their respective authors/editors) are clinical pearls, reflecting wisdom from lessons learned under years of experience. This aspect reflects the beautiful apprenticeship that is clinical medicine. In this regard, this book provides such golden nuggets of dermatological information, particularly in the Introduction and in the chapter, “Clues to the Diagnosis of Skin Lesions in the Immunocompromised Host.” I applaud the authors for this herculean endeavour of putting together a text that attempts to concisely describe skin presentations of infectious diseases in immunocompromised hosts. For physicians and allied care personnel involved in managing such patients, this book will visually complement standard textbooks of infectious diseases. Potential conflicts of interest. Board member: CSL Behring (Canada) and Sunovion, Consultant: Pfizer, Grants: CSL Behring (Canada), Speakers' Bureau: CSL Behring (Canada) and Sunovion. The author has submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infectious DiseasesSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207