MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149547120 · doi:10.4000/vertigo.6782

Analyse et suivi du phénomène de la désertification en Algérie du nord

2009· article· fr· W2149547120 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Benslimane, Abderrahmane Hamımed, Wael El Zerey, K. Mederbal

Bibliographic record

VenueVertigO · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWater management and technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La présente étude a pour objectif de contribuer au suivi de la désertification au nord d’Algérie par l’utilisation des capteurs MODIS (MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) de TERRA. A cet effet, certains paramètres géophysiques (albédo "R0", indice de végétation "NDVI" et température de surface "TS") sont produits régulièrement et couvrent la période de 2000 à 2005. Les combinaisons de ces paramètres deux à deux en particulier R0 -TS ; NDVI-TS et NDVI-R0 ont permis respectivement la caractérisation de l'état hydrique et de l'état de la végétation.La synthèse de l'ensemble des résultats sous un système d’information géographique (SIG), ainsi que leurs confrontations avec d'autres types de données ont permis de dresser des cartes de la sensibilité à la désertification selon cinq degrés (très bon état, bon état, état critique, état dégradé et état très dégradé). Ces résultats montrent qu’environ 75 % des parcours steppiques sont désertifiés ou au seuil de la désertification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVertigOSame topicWater management and technologiesFrench-language works237,207