Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of a Styrene Polymerization Reactor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach was adopted to simulate benzoyl peroxide (BPO)‐initiated styrene polymerization in a laboratory‐scale continuous stirred‐tank reactor (CSTR). The CFD results revealed the effects of non‐homogeneity and the short‐circuiting of the unreacted styrene and initiator on the reactor performance. The study also investigated the effects of the impeller speed and the residence time on the conversion and the flow behavior of the system. The CFD simulation showed that intense mixing remained confined to a small region near the impeller. With increasing impeller speed, it was found that the perfectly mixed region near the impeller expanded, thus reducing non‐homogeneity. Different contours were generated and exhibited the effect of the mixing parameters on the propagation rate and styrene conversion. The monomer and initiator conversions predicted with the CFD model were compared to those obtained with a CSTR model. The CFD model accounts for the non‐ideality behavior of the polymerization reactor, and hence conversion predictions are more realistic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".