J. Mantel and J. Funke-Furber. Forgotten Revolution: The Priory Method – A Restorative Care Model for Older Persons. Victoria, BC: Trafford, 2003.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Les auteurs passent en revue les progrès les plus novateurs en soins de longue durée au Canada dans le livre Forgotten Revolution. À partir d'entrevues et de documents historiques, les auteurs racontent comment Vera McIver, avec le soutien de l'administration et du personnel, a élaboré un modèle en soins de rétablissement. Ce modèle, qui se veut une réflexion sur l'art et la science nécessaires pour fournir des soins aux personnes âgées, révèle comment un milieu vraiment thérapeutique peut favoriser chez une personne la capacité à avoir une vie intéressante, même en vivant en établissement de soins prolongés. Les résidents ont appris à devenir plus actifs, à s'engager et à jouer un rôle plus important dans l'ensemble de la collectivité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".