The Role Performance of the Inspectorate Division of the Ministry of Education in Inspecting Secondary Schools in Adamawa State of Nigeria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a survey study carried out in Adamawa State of Nigeria to determine the role performance of the inspectoratedivision of the ministry of education in inspecting secondary schools. Sixty (60) principals and 60 teachers whichwere proportionately stratified along five educational zones of Adamawa State, participated in the study. A closeended questionnaire was used to collect the relevant data for the study. The instrument sought information on roleperformance of the inspectorate division on types of inspection visits, feedback on inspection, inspection reports,curriculum innovations and impact of inspection in secondary schools. Data was analysed through Z-test andfactorial analysis of variance. Results of the analysis of responses from the questionnaire include that, the roleperformance of the inspectorate division of the ministry of education on types of inspection visits and feedback oninspection is low. The role performance of theinspectorate division on inspection reports, curriculum innovations andimpact of inspection is high. Finally, the result shows that the role performance of the inspectorate division on thefive factors of performance is low. It was recommended among others that adequate and qualified human andmaterial resources should be provided in the inspectorate division by the federal and state ministries of education tomake the role performance of the division high in secondary schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".