MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149667998 · doi:10.1109/spawc.2001.923921

Discretization-free method for designing variable fractional delay 2-D FIR filters

2002· article· en· W2149667998 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Filter Design and Implementation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsFinite impulse responseVariable (mathematics)DiscretizationWeightingFunction (biology)Digital filterFilter (signal processing)Applied mathematicsAlgorithmMathematical analysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a closed-form weighted least-squares solution for designing variable two-dimensional (2D) digital filters with continuously variable 2D fractional delays. First, the coefficients of the variable 2D FIR filter are represented by using the polynomials of a pair of fractional delays (p/sub 1/,p/sub 2/). Then the weighted squared-error function of the variable 2D frequency response is derived without sampling the two frequencies (w/sub 1/,w/sub 2/) and the two fractional delays (p/sub 1/, p/sub 2/), which leads to a significant reduction in computational complexity. With the assumption that the overall weighting function is separable and stepwise, the design problem is reduced to the minimization of the weighted squared-error function. Finally, the closed-form solutions for the optimal coefficient matrices of the variable 2D FIR filter are derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Filter Design and ImplementationFrench-language works237,207