Influenzavirus Infection Is a Primary Cause of Febrile Respiratory Illness in HIV-Infected Adults, Despite Vaccination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are, to our knowledge, no prospective studies of respiratory tract infections in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults in the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era. We performed a surveillance study of outpatients who presented with fever and respiratory symptoms to examine the role of viral pathogens in these patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients with a temperature of >38.0 degrees C and respiratory symptoms were recruited from a tertiary care HIV clinic during the period 2003-2006. Nasal pharyngeal samples were tested for influenzavirus A and B, respiratory syncytial virus, and human metapneumovirus using real-time multiplex polymerase chain reaction assays. Paired acute- and convalescent-phase serum samples were tested for respiratory viruses by complement fixation. RESULTS: Fifty patients (90% of whom were receiving HAART) were included in the study (median CD4(+) T cell count, 325 cells/microL; median HIV RNA level, <50 copies/mL). A causative pathogen was identified in 25 patients (50%). Even though 76% of subjects had received influenza vaccine, viral infections were diagnosed in 21 patients (42%), as follows: influenza A, 10 patients; influenza B, 10; and parainfluenza virus type 3 infection, 1. Patients with and those without viral infection had similar demographic characteristics and HIV statuses. No patients with influenza and 23% of patients with other conditions had radiography-confirmed pneumonia (P=.07). Antibiotic prescriptions were common: 70% of patients received antibiotics. No patients with influenza required hospitalization, compared with 21% of other patients (P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Although illness was mild, influenza accounted for a large proportion of unscheduled visits to a health care provider for respiratory illness and was associated with unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions that may contribute to antimicrobial resistance. Vaccination alone was insufficient to prevent infection. Thus, specific identification and management of influenza should be performed in HIV-infected outpatients who present with fever and respiratory symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".