MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149688560 · doi:10.2110/jsr.2006.016

Precambrain Fault Systems as Control on Regional Differences in Relative Sea Level Along the Early Ordovician Platform of Eastern North America

2006· article· en· W2149688560 on OpenAlexaffabout
Osman Salad Hersi, George R. Dix

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sedimentary Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyOrdovicianFault (geology)PaleontologyOceanographySeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study proposes that there was regional variation in Early Ordovician subsidence histories along eastern Laurentia controlled by broad differences in the susceptibility of inherited Precambrian crustal structure to reactivation with changing ocean-basin tectonism. Two continental-scale Phanerozoic fault systems (Southern Oklahoma Fault System, Ottawa–Bonnechère Graben) extend into the craton interior from the apices of the Ouachita and Quebec embayments or reentrants, respectively. Their traces identify reactivated Proterozoic fault zones. Previous studies show that rates of subsidence for Early Ordovician sedimentation along the axis of the Southern Oklahoma Fault System are elevated compared to regional rates beyond this structural corridor. A similar history applies to Early Ordovician sedimentation within the Ottawa Embayment (eastern Ontario), along the present axis of the Ottawa–Bonnechère Graben. The Theresa Formation (lower Beekmantown Group) contains a third-order peritidal (siliciclastic-dominated) sequence. Evidence for local tectonism prior to and during its development within the embayment includes: (1) Late Cambrian (pre-Theresa) preferential uplift, differential erosion, and subsidence along the eastern structural boundary of the embayment; (2) differential intrabasinal subsidence during Theresa deposition; (3) an apparent offset in timing of peak flooding within the embayment to that along the St. Lawrence Promontory, ~ 1500 km distant; and (4) absence of a subaerial unconformity in the embayment that otherwise separates eustatic cycles on the promontory, and defines a likely sea-level fall below the shelf margin. In comparison, subsidence within the embayment appears to have matched (at least) the rate of the eustatic fall. Regional differences in Early Ordovician subsidence histories along this margin may illustrate that the Precambrian fault zones were structurally more sensitive than promontories to the developing reconfiguration of oceanic lithospheric elements that would lead to the Taconic orogeny.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sedimentary ResearchSame topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207