Pilot study of interferon‐α and ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C and normal transaminase values
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combination interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin treatment has become standard therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and elevated transaminase levels (> 1.5 x upper limit of normal). No previous study has specifically examined the efficacy of this treatment in patients with normal transaminase values. In this pilot study, we treated 19 patients, with normal or near-normal ALT values on at least three occasions, and histologically mild disease, with induction IFN-alpha2b, 5 mega units daily for 4 weeks, then 3 mega units thrice weekly for 44 week, plus concomitant ribavirin 1000 mg or 1200 mg daily for 48 weeks. Nine of the 19 (47%) showed sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. No ALT flares were observed in any patient. We conclude that combination induction IFN-alpha and ribavirin therapy may be effective in patients with normal-ALT, and appears not to induce flares of ALT activity. Controlled trials of this treatment in this subgroup of patients with hepatitis C are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it