Pilot study of interferon‐α and ribavirin treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C and normal transaminase values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Combination interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin treatment has become standard therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and elevated transaminase levels (> 1.5 x upper limit of normal). No previous study has specifically examined the efficacy of this treatment in patients with normal transaminase values. In this pilot study, we treated 19 patients, with normal or near-normal ALT values on at least three occasions, and histologically mild disease, with induction IFN-alpha2b, 5 mega units daily for 4 weeks, then 3 mega units thrice weekly for 44 week, plus concomitant ribavirin 1000 mg or 1200 mg daily for 48 weeks. Nine of the 19 (47%) showed sustained virological response, defined as undetectable HCV-RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. No ALT flares were observed in any patient. We conclude that combination induction IFN-alpha and ribavirin therapy may be effective in patients with normal-ALT, and appears not to induce flares of ALT activity. Controlled trials of this treatment in this subgroup of patients with hepatitis C are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".