An architecture for integrating mobile ad hoc networks with the internet using multiple mobile gateways
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) are typically considered as stand-alone, autonomous networks that support multihop communication without relying on any existing infrastructure. However, the integration of MANETs and infrastructure networks such as the Internet extends the network coverage and increases the application domain of ad hoc networks. In this paper we propose an architecture for integrating MANETs and the Internet using multiple mobile gateways. We used an extended ad hoc on demand distance vector (AODV) routing protocol and mobile IP (MIP) to achieve the integration. The proposed architecture has two main features. First, it provides global communication between MANETs and the Internet using a subset MANET nodes called mobile gateways (MGs) and the MIP foreign agents. The MGs are selected among MANET nodes based on the node stability, load and distance metrics. Second, it allows the MANET nodes to maintain multiple routes to the MGs using hybrid gateway discovery mechanisms. The simulation results of the proposed architecture indicate that the use of multiple mobile gateways and hybrid gateway discovery mechanisms enhance the network performance while providing bi-directional Internet connectivity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".