MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149774302 · doi:10.5151/meceng-wccm2012-18265

THERMO-ELECTRO-MECHANICAL INVESTIGATION OF VOLTAGE DROP IN ANODE ASSEMBLY USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD

2014· article· en· W2149774302 on OpenAlexaff
Ebrahim Jeddi, Daniel Marceau, László I. Kiss, Lyne St‐Georges, Denis Laroche, Lyès Hacini

Bibliographic record

VenueBlucher Mechanical Engineering Proceedings · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Destructive Testing Techniques
Canadian institutionsRio Tinto (Canada)Université du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnodeMaterials scienceVoltage dropFinite element methodVoltageParametric statisticsOverheating (electricity)ThermalStub (electronics)Drop (telecommunication)Composite materialThermal expansionMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectrodeThermodynamicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In today's context, aluminum producers strive to improve their position regarding energy consumption and production costs. To do so, mathematical modeling offers a good way to study the behavior of the cell during its life. In this paper, a fully-coupled, thermoelectro-mechanical (TEM) model of a whole hexapod anode assembly is presented. The parametric finite element (FE) model was developed using APDL (ANSYS Parametric Design Language) and was solved with a FESh++ TEM application to simulate the thermal and electrical effects of the reduction process on the anode assembly. A half block submodel of the full anode assembly model was used for the analysis in order to achieve a better understanding of the system and to evaluate the hypothesis of lowering the anodic voltage drop in the anode assembly through a simple change in the stub diameter. After calibration with the experimental results, sensitivity analysis (SA) was carried out to investigate the impact of changes of some critical parameters on the initial air gap at the cast iron to carbon interface and consequently on the total voltage drop in the system. These critical parameters were: effective stub temperature at cast iron solidification, stub diameter and coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) which showed they have marginal or remarkable impact on the total voltage drop depending on the operating temperature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlucher Mechanical Engineering ProceedingsSame topicNon-Destructive Testing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207