MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149825187 · doi:10.1109/tnano.2009.2034142

Continuum Models Incorporating Surface Energy for Static and Dynamic Response of Nanoscale Beams

2009· article· en· W2149825187 on OpenAlexaff
Chang Liu, R. K. N. D. Rajapakse

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structures
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanoelectromechanical systemsNanoscopic scaleCantileverMaterials scienceBoundary value problemNanomechanicsBeam (structure)SiliconTimoshenko beam theoryVibrationSurface stressContinuum mechanicsFabricationMechanicsSurface energyOpticsNanotechnologyPhysicsOptoelectronicsComposite materialAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanoscale beams are commonly found in nanomechanical and nanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) and other nanotechnology-based devices. Surface energy has a significant effect on nanoscale structures and is associated with their size-dependent behavior. In this paper, a general mechanistic model based on the Gurtin-Murdoch continuum theory accounting for surface energy effects is presented to analyze thick and thin nanoscale beams with an arbitrary cross section. The main contributions of this paper are a set of closed-form analytical solutions for the static response of thin and thick beams under different loading (point and uniformly distributed) and boundary conditions (simply-supported, cantilevered, and clamped ends), as well as the solution of the free vibration characteristics of such beams. Selected numerical results are presented for aluminum and silicon beams to demonstrate their salient response features. It is shown that classical beam theory is not accurate in situations where the surface residual stress and/or surface elastic constants are relatively large. An intrinsic length scale for beams is identified that depends on beam surface properties and cross-sectional shape. The present work provides a convenient set of analytical tools for researchers working on NEMS design and fabrication to understand the static and dynamic behavior of nanoscale beams including their size-dependent behavior and the effects of common boundary conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations123
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on NanotechnologySame topicNonlocal and gradient elasticity in micro/nano structuresFrench-language works237,207