NEUROMUSCULAR RESPONSE OF THE TRUNK FOLLOWING INERTIAL-BASED PERTURBATIONS WITH WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION EXPOSURE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of vibration exposure on the neuromuscular responses to inertial-based trunk perturbations. Thirteen, male participants (mean = 22.5 yrs ± 3.2) were assigned to one of two experimental groups: 1) participants not exposed to vibration (control group - CG, n=6), and, 2) participants exposed to vibration (vibration group - VG, n=7) throughout the protocol. Participants experienced 40 perurbations, of which half were in known and unknown directions. Data from trunk sEMG, motion capture markers and seat accelerometers were anaylzed. Repeated measures ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test were used to determine statistical significance (p<0.05). Participants in CG had a 14% faster muscle onset time than VG. Antagonistic muscle onset times were faster than agonists in both groups. Perturbations of known direction did not show any anticipation effects both in sEMG amplitude and in L4-5 joint angle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".