MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149848774 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2008.4739446

Equivalence to dissipative Hamiltonian realization

2008· article· en· W2149848774 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipative systemVector fieldHamiltonian (control theory)MathematicsEquivalence (formal languages)Hamiltonian systemCovariant Hamiltonian field theoryHomotopyMathematical analysisPure mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical optimizationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the problem of deriving a generalized Hamiltonian potential for autonomous dynamical systems. For a given vector field, the objective is to construct a locally defined dissipative Hamiltonian generating function for the system. The proposed approach consists of studying the deviation of the given vector field from a canonically defined Hamiltonian vector field. First, we obtain a one-form by taking the interior product of a nonvanishing two-form with respect to the vector field. We then construct a homotopy operator on a star-shaped region that decomposes the system into an exact part and an anti-exact one. Equivalence between the exact part and an exact one-form generated from a known potential is then used to compute the locally defined dissipative potential of the original system. An example is presented to illustrate the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.209

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it