MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149861736 · doi:10.3905/jfi.2008.712351

Duration and Pricing of TIPS

2008· article· en· W2149861736 on OpenAlexaff
Gady Jacoby, Ilona Shiller

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Fixed Income · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicStochastic processes and financial applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New BrunswickUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTreasuryBondValuation (finance)EconomicsExtant taxonEconometricsEmbedded optionBond valuationValuation of optionsElasticity (physics)Actuarial scienceFinancial economicsAsset (computer security)Capital asset pricing modelMonetary economicsMathematical economicsAccountingComputer scienceFinanceLawPhysicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We apply risk-neutral valuation to price TIPS bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, paying close attention to an option embedded in these bonds that guaranties that bondholders are not affected by deflation. The value of this option is assumed to be trivial in the extant literature. We use a numerical simulation to show that the option value is nontrivial. We also consider the elasticity of TIPS bonds with respect to the real rate and the nominal rate and compare it to the Macaulay duration. An empirical test provides strong support for the adjustment suggested by our model for the elasticity of TIPS bonds. TOPICS:Asset-backed securities (ABS), legal/regulatory/public policy, statistical methods, simulations

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Fixed IncomeSame topicStochastic processes and financial applicationsFrench-language works237,207