MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149862911 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2009.2020322

Adaptive Variable Block-Size Early Motion Estimation Termination Algorithm for H.264/AVC Video Coding Standard

2009· article· en· W2149862911 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Golam Sarwer, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion estimationQuarter-pixel motionEncoderAlgorithmBlock sizeComputer scienceCoding (social sciences)Block (permutation group theory)Motion compensationContext-adaptive variable-length codingComputer visionData compressionMathematicsContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingStatisticsKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variable block-size motion estimation (ME) process is the H.264/AVC encoder's most time-consuming function. This letter proposes to reduce the complexity of the ME process with an early termination algorithm that features an adaptive threshold based on the statistical characteristics of rate-distortion (RD) cost regarding current block and previously processed blocks and modes. In this method, most motion searches can be stopped early, with a large number of search points saved. A region-based search is also suggested to further reduce the computation required for full search ME. A search point reduction scheme for the fast motion estimation of H.264/AVC is also introduced, and the experimental results illustrate how the proposed method reduces ME times for full search and fast motion estimation by about 77 and 31%, respectively, despite the insignificant degradation of RD performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207