MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149875071 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1344956

Pie: scalable routing in peer-to-peer networks

2004· article· en· W2149875071 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter Lichodzijewski, Leigh Wetmore, A. Nur Zincir‐Heywood

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPeer-to-Peer Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaKillam Trusts
KeywordsPastryDistributed hash tableComputer scienceChord (peer-to-peer)ScalabilityDistributed computingPeer-to-peerComputer networkHash tableRouting protocolRouting (electronic design automation)Hash functionConsistent hashingLoad balancing (electrical power)Theoretical computer scienceDatabaseComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Distributed hash tables (DHTs) are a class of algorithms used to store and retrieve information in peer-to-peer (P2P) systems in a scalable and robust fashion. Pie, a routing protocol for a new DHT framework, is presented. The performance of this algorithm is empirically compared to an existing DHT framework, Chord. Results show that Pie performs better than Chord with respect to the number of logical hops. It also yields a smaller delay and better load balancing. The results are supported by a paired t-test at an alpha level of 0.01.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPeer-to-Peer Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207