MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149884933 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.2975

Polarization Measurements in High-Energy Deuteron Photodisintegration

2001· article· en· W2149884933 on OpenAlex
K. Wijesooriya, Andrei Afanasev, M. Amarian, K. Aniol, Saïda Ben Becher, K. Benslama, L. Bimbot, P. Bosted, E. J. Brash, J. R. Calarco, Z. Chai, C. C. Chang, Tung‐Zong Chang, J.-P. Chen, Seonho Choi, E. Chudakov, S. Churchwell, D. Crovelli, Sonja Dieterich, S. Dumalski, D. Dutta, M. Epstein, K. Fissum, B. Fox, S. Frullani, H. Gao, J. Gao, F. Garibaldi, O. Gayou, R. Gilman, A. Glamazdin, C. Glashausser, J. Gómez, V. Gorbenko, O. Hansen, R. J. Holt, Jordan Hovdebo, G. M. Huber, C. W. de Jager, X. Jiang, Catherine Jones, M. Jones, James J. Kelly, E. Kinney, Edgar E. Kooijman, G. Kumbartzki, J. J. LeRose, M. Liang, R. Lindgren, N. Liyanage, S. Malov, D. J. Margaziotis, P. Markowitz, K. McCormick, D. Meekins, Z.-E. Meziani, R. Michaels, Jason W. Mitchell, L. Morand, C. F. Perdrisat, R. Pomatsalyuk, V. Punjabi, R. D. Ransome, R. Roché, M. Rvachev, A. Saha, A. Sarty, Eva C. Schulte, Daniel T. Simon, S. Strauch, R. Suleiman, L. Todor, P. E. Ulmer, G. M. Urciuoli, B. Wojtsekhowski, Feng Xiong, W. Xu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsThomas Jefferson National Accelerator FacilityNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsPhotodisintegrationPolarization (electrochemistry)HelicityHadronNuclear physicsParticle physicsPhotonRecoilPerturbative QCDBaryonMesonPhoton polarizationQuantum chromodynamicsDeuteriumProtonAtomic physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present measurements of the recoil proton polarization for the $d(\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{\ensuremath{\gamma}},\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{p})n$ reaction at ${\ensuremath{\theta}}_{\mathrm{c}.\mathrm{m}.}\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}90\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}$ for photon energies up to 2.4 GeV. These are the first data in this reaction for polarization transfer with circularly polarized photons. The induced polarization ${p}_{y}$ vanishes above 1 GeV, contrary to meson-baryon model expectations, in which resonances lead to large polarizations. However, the polarization transfer ${C}_{x}$ does not vanish above 1 GeV, inconsistent with hadron helicity conservation. Thus, we show that the scaling behavior observed in the $d(\ensuremath{\gamma},p)n$ cross sections is not a result of perturbative QCD. These data should provide important tests of new nonperturbative calculations in the intermediate energy regime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it