MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149901505 · doi:10.1002/qua.24839

State‐to‐state reaction dynamics for the reactions of atom N with radicals

2014· article· en· W2149901505 on OpenAlexaff
Xixi Hu, Changjian Xie, Daiqian Xie

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsReaction dynamicsRadicalAb initioWave packetPotential energy surfaceQuantum dynamicsChemistryAtom (system on chip)QuantumPotential energyAb initio quantum chemistry methodsState (computer science)Computational chemistryAtomic physicsQuantum mechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Much progress has been achieved in the developments of accurate and efficient algorithms for quantum dynamics calculations in the past two decades. Based on the reliable potential energy surfaces (PESs) constructed with state‐of‐the‐art ab initio calculations, quantum reactive scattering calculations for the atom‐diatom collisions can be performed accurately at the state‐to‐state level. In this review, we described the general strategies of constructing a PES and the Chebyshev real wave packet method briefly, and summarized our recent studies on the PESs and state‐to‐state reaction dynamics for the reactions of the atom N with radicals OH, CH, and C2. Such barrierless complex‐forming reactions are very important for understanding low‐temperature reaction dynamics and still difficult to treat accurately. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207