Cytoskeletal rearrangements in gastric epithelial cells in response to Helicobacter pylori infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori causes host epithelial cell cytoskeletal rearrangements mediated by the translocation and tyrosine phosphorylation of an outer-membrane protein, CagA, and by the vacuolating cytotoxin, VacA. However, the mechanisms by which H. pylori mediates cytoskeletal rearrangements in infected host cells need to be more clearly defined. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of H. pylori isolates from children on the architecture of host gastric epithelial cells. Gastric epithelial (AGS) cells were infected with type I (cagE(+), cagA(+), VacA(+)) H. pylori, a type II H. pylori strain (cagE(-), cagA(-), VacA(-)) or a cagE isogenic mutant. Double-labelled immune fluorescence was used to detect adherent H. pylori and the distribution of F-actin, alpha-actinin and Arp3. Both type I and type II H. pylori strains induced stress fibres in gastric epithelial cells that were not observed in uninfected cells. Type I H. pylori also induced cell elongation (hummingbird phenotype) after 4 h of infection, whereas the type II H. pylori strain did not. Less elongation occurred when AGS cells were exposed to a cagE isogenic mutant, compared with the parental strain. Confocal microscopy showed Arp3 accumulation in AGS cells infected with wild-type H. pylori, but not in response to infection with the cagE mutant. These findings indicate that type I H. pylori induce a stress fibre-like phenotype in infected gastric epithelia by a mechanism that is different from the induction of host-cell elongation. In addition to CagA and VacA, cagE also impacts on the morphology of infected gastric epithelial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".