MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149915545 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2007.892885

Erbium Amplifier Dynamics in Wireless Analog Optical Links With Modulator Bias Optimization

2007· article· en· W2149915545 on OpenAlexaff
Marco Michele Sisto, Sophie LaRochelle, Leslie A. Rusch, Philippe Giaccari

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierModulation (music)Analog transmissionSIGNAL (programming language)Optical amplifierComputer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Electronic engineeringElectro-optic modulatorErbiumOptical transistorOptical modulation amplitudeOptical modulatorPhysicsTelecommunicationsAnalog signalPhase modulationElectrical engineeringOpticsEngineeringBandwidth (computing)VoltageTransistor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> Modulator bias optimization is a technique used to improve the transmitted radio-frequency power of amplified analog optical links. However, when bias optimization is used, the mean optical power at the modulator output is dependent on the amplitude of the modulation signal. In this letter, we show how fluctuations of the modulation signal power, in conjunction with the dynamic behavior of the erbium optical amplifier, can deteriorate the transmission of data frames compliant to the 802.11 a/g IEEE protocol. Optical and electrical compensating methods, based on mean power clamping at the modulator output, are proposed, and their efficiency in restoring a high-quality transmission is demonstrated. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207