MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2149929536 · doi:10.5430/jha.v4n1p43

Relieving emergency department crowding: Simulating the effects of improving patient flow over time

2014· article· en· W2149929536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Eric Hamrock, Kerrie Paige, Jennifer Parks, James J. Scheulen, Scott Levin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Administration · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrowdingEmergency departmentStaffingDwell timeMedicineEveningRush hourCensusEmergency medicineMedical emergencyNursingPsychologyPopulationTransport engineeringEngineeringEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Emergency Departments (ED) are challenged with excess demand for services and inadequate system capacity.Crowding at two independent EDs within a health system prompted an examination of the potential effects of improving patientthroughput. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of reducing ED dwell time on temporal patterns of patientflow and demand for ED resources.Methods: Separate discrete event simulation (DES) models were developed for the EDs of a 1,000-bed urban medical centerand a 560-bed community medical center using patient flow information. These models characterized the effects of reducingpatient dwell time on ED care area census (i.e., staffing needs), waiting room census, total length of stay (LOS) and waiting time. Dwell time was defined as the time interval from when a patient entered the main ED care area to when the patient exited the ED by discharge or hospital admission. Total LOS is defined as the entire time interval from ED from arrival to exit (includingwaiting time).Results: DES results for each site demonstrate how natural patient arrivals and common hospital admission processes generatecommon temporal patterns of decreased crowding. Improving flow translates to most substantial reductions in waiting timeand waiting room census during evening hours (17:00 to 22:00 hours). Significant effects on ED care area census and staffingdemands are lagged, not occurring until overnight hours (2:00 to 8:00 hours). We reduced patient dwell time in 5% incrementswithin the urban ED (16.2 min) and community ED (13.5 min) from 5% to 15%. For example, a 10% decrease in dwell timeat the urban ED (32.4 min) and community ED (27.0 min) resulted in respective decreases in evening waiting room census by49% (10.8 patients) and 26% (3.5 patients) during evening hours and ED care area census by 16% (3.6 patients) and 11% (2.0patients) overnight.Conclusions: DES results suggest that increasing ED efficiency will most significantly decrease delays experienced by eveningarrivals and provide opportunities to decrease care area census and reduce staff overnight.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.214
Threshold uncertainty score0.308

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital AdministrationSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207