MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2149977322 · doi:10.1109/icebeg.2011.5881855

The effect of free trade area on technology innovation: An analysis of mechanism and empirical test

2011· article· en· W2149977322 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Li Ping, Kong Shuai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaInternational tradeGlobalizationBusinessFree trade agreementMember statesInternational economicsEconomic globalizationMechanism (biology)Empirical researchEconomicsFree tradePolitical scienceMarket economyEuropean union

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Under the trend of economic globalization, the domestic and international markets are very competitive. The establishment of free trade area (FTA) makes member countries much easier to communicate with each other and introduce advanced technologies, so technological innovation ability of the member countries can be promoted through trade, FDI, etc. Such effects are testified in this paper with the R&D input-output function and time series data of the representative countries in NAFTA, ASEAN, such as America, Canada, Mexico, Singapore and China. The empirical results show that after entering into the FTA, each member country's innovation level is enhanced obviously, however, the impacts are different for the member countries of different FTAs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.127

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGlobal trade and economics→French-language works237,207→