MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150057756 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2004.1326431

Blind deconvolution using Bayesian methods with application to the dereverberation of speech

2004· article· en· W2150057756 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Daly, J.R. Reilly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeconvolutionBlind deconvolutionComputer scienceMarkov chain Monte CarloImpulse responseBayesian probabilityAlgorithmSpeech recognitionSpeech enhancementImpulse (physics)Monte Carlo methodConvolution (computer science)Finite impulse responseArtificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsNoise reduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A blind deconvolution algorithm is presented to address the problem of the dereverberation of speech. A Bayesian algorithm is developed for estimating the source, and the problem of ill-conditioning due to long tails of an acoustic impulse response (AIR) is avoided by marginalizing out the unknown channel parameters. The initial samples of the MAP estimate are determined using a stochastic MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) technique, and these estimates are then used in a sequential procedure for estimating the remaining signal. A filterbank implementation is used to reduce the large deconvolution problem into several smaller independent problems. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the performance of the algorithm applied to the dereverberation of speech.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207