MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150079255 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m303490200

Direct Demonstration of ATP-dependent Release of SecA from a Translocating Preprotein by Surface Plasmon Resonance

2003· article· en· W2150079255 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jeanine de Keyzer, Chris van der Does, Tomas G. Kloosterman, Arnold J. M. Driessen

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurface plasmon resonanceBiophysicsChemistryResonance (particle physics)Cell biologyBiochemistryNanotechnologyBiologyPhysicsMaterials scienceAtomic physicsNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Translocase mediates the transport of preproteins across the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. SecA binds with high affinity to the membrane-embedded protein-conducting SecYEG complex and serves as both a receptor for secretory proteins and as an ATP-driven molecular motor. Cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis by SecA drive the progressive movement of the preprotein across the membrane. Surface plasmon resonance allows an online monitoring of protein interactions. Here we report on the kinetic analysis of the interaction between SecA and the membrane-embedded SecYEG complex. Immobilization of membrane vesicles containing overproduced SecYEG on the Biacore Pioneer L1 chip allows the detection of high affinity SecA binding to the SecYEG complex and online monitoring of the translocation of the secretory protein proOmpA. SecA binds tightly to the SecYEG.proOmpA complex and is released only upon ATP hydrolysis. The results provide direct evidence for a model in which SecA cycles at the SecYEG complex during translocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchFrench-language works237,207