MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150092003 · doi:10.7202/016049ar

Empreintes de corps

2007· article· fr· W2150092003 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Noémie N. Moreau, Florence Vinit

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles pratiques sociales · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSocial innovationPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La possibilité d’action de la médecine moderne a essentiellement porté sur une modification de l’espace du corps, auquel s’est ajouté un quadrillage de l’espace social, surveillant les corps. La médicalisation actuelle semble changer de paradigme et se fonder sur une inscription temporelle inédite du corps. Parallèlement, la régulation des corps s’effectue le plus souvent par l’intériorisation d’une norme temporelle, dont témoigne le recours aux médicaments. Cet article montre comment la médicalisation actuelle du social semble passer d’une logique disciplinaire (investissement spatial du corps) à une transformation de sa structure temporelle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles pratiques socialesSame topicHistorical and Scientific StudiesFrench-language works237,207