A Proteomic Analysis of Lysosomal Integral Membrane Proteins Reveals the Diverse Composition of the Organelle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lysosomes are endocytic subcellular compartments that contribute to the degradation and recycling of cellular material. Using highly purified rat liver tritosomes (Triton WR1339-filled lysosomes) and an ion exchange chromatography/LC-tandem MS-based protein/peptide separation and identification procedure, we characterized the major integral membrane protein complement of this organelle. While many of the 215 proteins we identified have been previously associated with lysosomes and endosomes, others have been associated with the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, cytosol, plasma membrane, and lipid rafts. At least 20 proteins were identified as unknown cDNAs that have no orthologues of known function, and 35 proteins were identified that function in protein and vesicle trafficking. This latter group includes multiple Rab and SNARE proteins as well as ubiquitin. Defining the roles of these proteins in the lysosomal membrane will assist in elucidating novel lysosomal functions involved in cellular homeostasis and pathways that are affected in various disease processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".