Movimento Popular Urbano e Mulheres no Brasil: Uma Experiência de Feminização das Políticas Públicas de Habitação
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoEste artigo vai abordar a mutação do movimento por moradia, permeado pela presença significativa de mulheres em sua base e liderança, e mostrar até que ponto esse processo contribui para a elaboração das políticas públicas habitacionais. Esta pesquisa ilustra como a tomada de consciência da questão de gênero coopera para mudanças nas políticas públicas de moradia. A partir dos exemplos de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro, é possível saber de que forma uma estratégia de aliança entre organizações populares de tipo classista, grupos feministas e representantes eleitos progressistas contribui para a adoção de políticas públicas que levem em conta as condições de vida e especificidades das mulheres, assim como trazer à lume a influência que os movimentos sociais podem ter nas políticas públicas, colaborando para as transformações institucionais em matéria de políticas e ações públicas. Palavras-chave: Gênero, Movimento social, Política pública, Moradia, Governança. Abstract This article examines the changes that took place in the Brazilian housing movement through a growing participation of women in its organization and especially in its local leadership. It aims at understanding the degree in which this participation has contributed to the elaboration of housing public policy. This research illustrates how awareness around gender and housing issues contributes to promote changes in housing public policy. Using the examples of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro housing movement organizations, we observe how a strategic alliance between popular urban organizations, feminist groups and progressive elected representatives have contributed to the adoption of public policies that take into consideration the specificities and needs of low income urban women. We especially focus on the influence of social movements on public policy and on institutional changes in terms of politics and public action. Key words: gender, social movement, public policy, housing, governance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".