MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150204613 · doi:10.1504/ijmtm.2009.023781

A simulated annealing algorithm for dynamic system reconfiguration and production planning in cellular manufacturing

2009· article· en· W2150204613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsControl reconfigurationSimulated annealingMathematical optimizationProduction planningDynamic programmingComputer scienceProduction (economics)HeuristicCellular manufacturingMarkov chainAlgorithmMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most manufacturing system design problems have been studied under static conditions in which the facilities are configured on fixed shop floors for relatively long planning period by assuming constant product mix and demand. In today's dynamic business environment, shorter time periods should be considered where the product mix and demand may vary from period to period. As a result, the best facility layout for one period may not be efficient for subsequent periods. To address this issue, several authors proposed dynamic system reconfiguration models and solution procedures for manufacturing system design. In this paper, we consider an integrated problem of production planning and dynamic system reconfiguration in cellular manufacturing systems where production quantities are also decision variables. Based on this consideration, we propose a mathematical programming model for solving this problem. The solution of the model provides the planned production quantity, inventory level and system configuration for each period. Since the problem is NP-hard, we developed a heuristic algorithm based on multiple Markov chain simulated annealing to allow multiple search directions to be traced simultaneously. Numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the features of the proposed model and the computational efficiency of the developed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.555
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it