Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a rate control scheme with a binary feedback mechanism for available bit rate (ABR) services in an interconnected wireless/wired asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) network. The rate control system model consists of a single bottleneck node, multiple mobile/fixed traffic sources and a binary feedback scheme. The rate of the mobile ABR source is determined based on the binary feedback that is received from the bottleneck node, as well as on the quality of the wireless link between the mobile source and the base station. A mathematical model for the rate control scheme which takes into consideration the user mobility, wireless channel quality and propagation delays is developed. Markov modulated fluid modeling is used to characterize the stochastic nature of the mobile/fixed sources. We have shown that the system consisting of the multiple mobile/fixed traffic sources, binary feedback scheme, and the bottleneck node server can be modeled using a Markov process. We have derived a set of first-order linear differential equations and appropriate boundary conditions for the stationary distribution of the state process which describes the overall rate control system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".