Experimental study of human-induced dynamic forces due to bouncing on a perceptibly moving structure
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes the first direct measurements of human-induced dynamic forces due to bouncing on a perceptibly moving force platform. A unique test rig, permitting a person to bounce physically on an idealized "single-degree-of-freedom system" with variable natural frequency and mass, is described and the test methodology explained. A set of representative results for different structure and bouncing frequencies is presented for one test subject. These results clearly demonstrate the effect that the flexibility of the structure has on the levels of force and dynamic response achieved. In particular, it was established that the applied force drops considerably when the subject bounces at a frequency fairly close to the natural frequency of the structure. However, it was found that it was physically not possible to bounce at or very close to the natural frequency for the configuration of the test rig chosen. Finally, the acceleration and displacement responses indicate that both the first and second harmonics of the bouncing force are capable of producing a near resonant response.Key words: crowd loading, flexible structure, dynamics, human-structure interaction, bouncing, jouncing, bobbing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it