MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150258716 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2006.882992

Adaptive Control of Harmonic Drives Based on Virtual Decomposition

2006· article· en· W2150258716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalCanadian Space Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsController (irrigation)Control theory (sociology)Adaptive controlCompensation (psychology)HarmonicStability (learning theory)Reduction (mathematics)Computer sciencePID controllerHarmonic driveControl engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsMachine learningTemperature control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harmonic drives are interesting for robotic applications due to their attractive properties such as high reduction ratio, compact size, low mass, and coaxial assembly. However, the high friction and the dynamics of the flexspline are the main issues that significantly challenge the control systems. In this paper, an adaptive controller capable of adaptively compensating the friction, while incorporating the dynamics of the flexspline, is developed in both joint torque and joint-position control modes. The virtual decomposition control approach allows the dynamics of harmonic drives to be controlled separately from the conventional dynamics of the robots. Adaptive friction compensation and flexspline dynamics based control are the two main contributions of this paper. The L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> /L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">infin</sub> stability and the L <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sub> -gain-induced H <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">infin</sub> stability are guaranteed. Experimental results demonstrated in both time and frequency domains confirm the feasibility of the proposed approach

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.952
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it