An Expectation–Maximization-Based Interacting Multiple Model Approach for Cooperative Driving Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present a novel combined sensor registration and fusion approach for cooperative driving in intelligent transportation systems (ITSs). A realistic augmented registration and fusion-state space model in three dimensions is first developed for dissimilar sensors. In order to have unbiased sensor registration parameter estimates, the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is incorporated with the extended Kalman filter (EKF) to give simultaneous state and parameter estimates. Furthermore, the interacting multiple model (IMM) filter is introduced here for collaborative driving in order to deal with the jumping model problem occurred in different vehicles driving status. To evaluate the registration and fusion performance, a new recursive relationship is derived theoretically for computing the posterior Cramer-Rao bound (PCRB). It is shown by simulation that the proposed EM-IMM-EKF method has a more robust estimation performance than the conventional approach. The performance is furthermore verified by comparing the mean square error with the PCRB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it