MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150279987 · doi:10.1049/iet-map:20060176

Active quasi-circulator realisation with gain elements and slow-wave couplers

2007· article· en· W2150279987 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCirculatorInsertion lossReturn lossPower dividers and directional couplersAmplifierElectric power transmissionMicrostripCoupling (piping)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A microstrip active quasi-circulator is presented using two generic amplifier blocks and two power couplers. The power couplers are parallel-coupled lines with a slow-wave structure in order to improve the isolation between ports of the quasi-circulator. A detailed analytic design procedure is presented for the slow-wave couplers based on the capacitive coupling modelling approach for coupled transmission lines. Experimental results show that the quasi-circulator has an insertion loss between 1 and −2 dB, a return loss better than 11 dB at each of the ports and an isolation better than 20 dB from 1.0 to 3.0 GHz. The input 1 dB compression point is 14 dB m at 2.4 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.705
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it