MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150289507 · doi:10.1002/joe.20260

Legal developments—Gender issues now, and increasingly in the U.S. and EU spotlight

2009· article· en· W2150289507 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth D. MacGillivray, H. Juanita M. Beecher, Deirdre Golden

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Business and Organizational Excellence · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Labor and Employment Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversity (politics)Quarter (Canadian coin)Administration (probate law)Political scienceEuropean unionGender diversityMember statesLawPublic administrationBusinessEconomic policyFinanceHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ORC Worldwide believes that gender diversity will be an increasingly important issue in 2009 as both the United States and the European Union continue to focus on improving the status of women in the workplace and elsewhere. The new Obama administration is expected to quickly pass a number of new initiatives on gender pay discrimination, to reverse the Ledbetter decision as well as to revitalize the Equal Pay Act. The following is an update of the status of gender diversity in the third quarter of 2008. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.896
Threshold uncertainty score0.281

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Business and Organizational ExcellenceSame topicInternational Labor and Employment LawFrench-language works237,207