Estimating O–D travel time matrix by Google Maps API: implementation, advantages, and implications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many spatial analysis tasks call for the use of travel time between multiple origins and destinations, that is, O–D travel time matrix. Commercial geographical information systems (GIS) software requires the input of a well-defined road network dataset and significant efforts in implementing the task. However, road network data are often outdated, miss critical road condition details, or are expensive to acquire; and skillful usage of related software is a major obstacle for researchers without advanced training in GIS. This research develops a desktop tool for implementing the task by calling the Google Maps Application Programming Interface (API). By doing so, we are able to tap into the dynamically updated transportation network data and the routing rules maintained by Google and obtain a reliable estimate of O–D travel time matrix. The results are compared with those computed by the ArcGIS Network Analyst module to demonstrate its advantages. A case study in accessibility analysis is presented to illustrate the implications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it