MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150363977 · doi:10.1109/tic-sth.2009.5444374

Preliminary analysis of a legged robot designed to climb vertical surfaces

2009· article· en· W2150363977 on OpenAlexaff
Yasong Li, Ausama Ahmed, Claire Wu, Carlo Menon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHexapodKinematicsClimbRobotTrajectoryClimbingSimulationComputer scienceRobot kinematicsCorrectnessRobot locomotionGaitSoftwareEngineeringMobile robotArtificial intelligenceStructural engineeringRobot controlAerospace engineeringPhysicsAlgorithmPhysical medicine and rehabilitation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the kinematic analysis of a hexapod climbing robot relying on the use of dry adhesion. Kinematics equations are validated in both multi-body software simulation and robotic platform test. A particular trajectory of the legs, conceived to minimize force required to detach the robotic feet from a vertical wall, is proposed and tested. Further study is performed based on data acquired by forces exerted on the tip of each robotic leg during locomotion. Experimental results proved the correctness of kinematic analysis and its potential use for optimizing gait and adhesion features during wall climbing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdhesion, Friction, and Surface InteractionsFrench-language works237,207