MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150384199 · doi:10.1086/378703

Prevalence and Correlates of Untreated Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection among Persons Who Have Died in the Era of Modern Antiretroviral Therapy

2003· article· en· W2150384199 on OpenAlexaffabout
Evan Wood, Joan Montaner, Mark Tyndall, Martin T. Schechter, Michael V. O’Shaughnessy, Robert S. Hogg

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaAIDS VancouverSt. Paul's Hospital
FundersInternational AIDS Society
KeywordsMedicineAntiretroviral therapyHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Psychological interventionLogistic regressionPediatricsSidaInternal medicineImmunologyDemographyViral diseaseViral loadPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluated all human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related deaths over the period 1 January 1995-31 December 2001 in a Canadian province in which all HIV care and antiretroviral therapy are provided free of charge. Persons who had received antiretroviral drugs before death were compared with those who had died without ever receiving HIV treatment, by fitting a logistic model. Overall, 1239 deaths were attributed to HIV infection during the study period. Of these, 406 (32.8%) occurred among persons who had never received any HIV treatment. In adjusted analyses, aboriginal ethnicity, female sex, and lower median income were negatively associated with receiving HIV treatment before death. Furthermore, among the 833 individuals who received treatment before death, only 379 (45.5%) received antiretroviral medication >or=75% of the time during their first year receiving therapy. The data demonstrate the need for novel interventions to expand HIV care to specific populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.223

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207