Predictive collaborative performance system in B2B supply chain using neuro-fuzzy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, contemporary B2B supply chain management (B2B-SCM) has been furnished with semi-automated data record systems to gather large quantities. Notwithstanding, most of companies and academic research groups have also concentrated on the results of the historical performance measurement interpretation and relied on the things, what have already happened. These has been rarely concerned the performance inclination. It has resulted in the lack of well-rounded performance planning improvement in the long term. Moreover, they have focused on the physical operation performance enhancement without concerning the collaborative performance among their partners. On the grounds of the fact that, this paper is to present a Neuro-fuzzy system approach to construct collaborative performance which has forward looking collaborative capabilities and its linguistic rules to make understanding how to put the collaborative performance directions in another time. The methodology is as follows. Firstly, B2B-SC performance evaluation questionnaires, with two levels were able to distinguish collaborative relation between two or more partners in their SC were congregated from the case study chains. The data set of relationships between enterprise and its direct clients of the case study companies in France was used for manifestation. Secondly, data cleaning and preparations before the proposed model construction. The multi attribute decision making, simple additive weighting, was employed to build the collaborative performance scoring model, as well. Thirdly, the pervious results were use as the learning dataset to make up of the predictive collaborative performance system based on Neuro-fuzzy. Finally, the result deployment for collaborative performance guideline from model was validated by the domain experts in term of its real practical usage efficiency. The developed system enables managers to develop systematic manners to foresee future collaborative performance and recognize latent problems in their collaboration. The prognostic ability of the developed system is comparable with the decision of the manager in their collaboration. The comment on its usages and difficulties in its developed process are also discussed. Furthermore, the final predictive results and rules contain very interesting information relating to SC improvement in long runs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".