Respiratory Symptoms at Age 8 Years in a Cohort of Very Low Birth Weight Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The childhood respiratory consequences of very low birth weight (birth weight < or =1,500 g) are incompletely understood, especially since the introduction of recent changes in neonatal care. To assess prevalence, trends, and risk factors for respiratory symptoms, the authors followed to age 8 years a cohort of 384 very low birth weight children from six regional neonatal intensive care units in Wisconsin and Iowa who were born between August 1, 1988, and June 30, 1991. A control group of 154 Wisconsin schoolchildren was also assembled. Respiratory symptoms in the past 12 months and history of asthma ("asthma ever") were reported by parents on a questionnaire used in the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC). Control group prevalence resembled ISAAC prevalence worldwide and in Canada, but respiratory symptoms were twice as common among very low birth weight children. With advent of the availability of pulmonary surfactants, the prevalence of wheezing at age 8 decreased from 50% to 16% (p = 0.002) among children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia, but it increased from 14% to 38% among those with milder neonatal respiratory disease. Bronchopulmonary dysplasia, family history of asthma, smoking in the household, and patent ductus arteriosus were predictive of wheezing in the previous 12 months. Antenatal steroid therapy had a borderline-significant protective association with wheezing (odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval: 0.29, 1.1). There were interaction effects between several of the predictors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".