Oxovanadium(IV) Cyclam and Bicyclam Complexes: Potential CXCR4 Receptor Antagonists
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metal complexation can have a major influence on the antiviral and coreceptor binding properties of cyclam and bicyclam macrocycles. We report the synthesis of the vanadyl cyclam complexes [V((IV))O(cyclam)SO(4)] (1) and [V((IV))O(cyclam)Cl]Cl (2) and the analogous xylylbicyclam sulfato (3) and chlorido (4) complexes. The X-ray crystal structures of 1.1.33CH(3)OH and 2.CH(3)OH.1.5H(2)O show short V=O bonds (1.6093(19) and 1.599(3) A, respectively) with monodentate sulfate H-bonded to ring NH groups for 1, but a long V-Cl bond (2.650(12) A) for 2. The solid-state structures of 3 and 4 were compared to those of 1 and 2 using vanadium K-edge extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) data. These suggested that complex 4 was oligomeric and contained bridging chlorido ligands. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) studies suggested that the SO(4)(2-) (from 1) and Cl(-) (from 2) ligands are readily substituted by water in solution, whereas these remain partially bound for the V(IV) xylylbicyclam complexes 3 and 4. The vanadyl xylylbicyclam complexes were highly active against HIV-1 (III(B)) and HIV-2 (ROD) strains with IC(50) values in the range 1-5 microM for 3 and 0.1-0.3 microM for 4; in contrast the vanadyl cyclam complexes 1 and 2 were inactive. The factors that contribute to the activity of these complexes are discussed. Studies of vanadyl cyclam docked into a model of the human CXCR4 coreceptor revealed that the coordination of vanadium to the carboxylate of Asp171 may be accompanied by H-bonding to the macrocycle and an attractive V=O...H interaction involving the backbone Trp195 alpha-carbon proton of CXCR4. In addition, hydrophobic interactions with Trp195 are present. Both ring configuration and the xylyl linker may play roles in determining the higher activity of the bicyclam complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".