MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2150472479 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.4033

THREE-PHASED SUSTAINABLE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONCTON

2011· article· en· W2150472479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Design and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipScope (computer science)Modernization theorySustainable developmentEnvironmental planningSustainable designSustainabilityPolitical scienceGeographyComputer scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since 2000, Université de Moncton is the site of a three-phased academic environmental research, development, creation (RDC) initiative: (1) installation in 2000 on the University’s main campus of a 4 hectares Millennium Ecological park; (2) integration since 2002 of permanent and growing nature art installations towards an open air nature art museum in the park; and (3) development project of an Atlantic Canada Housing and Environmental Technology Centre. From a societal modernization theoretical approach, we will examine the direction and scope of this partnership based initiative which seeks to develop, demonstrate and communicate sustainable practices that contribute to social change regarding environmental and climate change issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.164
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it