Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rates of silicosis and other pneumoconiosis have declined in the past several decades as control measures have reduced occupational dust exposures in settings such as underground mines and exposures to agents such as asbestos.1 Meanwhile, occupational asthma (OA) has been reported to be the most common chronic occupational lung disease in many developed countries, with epidemiological studies estimating an occupational cause to about 15% of all adult-onset asthma in the working population.2 As with all occupational diseases, OA is potentially preventable3: it mostly follows sensitisation to high-molecular or low-molecular weight sensitising agents in a susceptible subpopulation of exposed workers.4 Primary prevention (elimination or reduction of exposure in the workplace) effectively reduces OA. Although genetic and other host factors predispose to development of sensitisation and OA, knowledge of these factors is insufficient to screen out workers from exposure to specific sensitisers. Secondary prevention, when exposure to sensitisers cannot be eliminated, includes formal medical surveillance to detect affected workers early, at a time …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".